Published on September 24th, 2021 | by University of Mississippi0
University of Mississippi Geologists Investigate Geological History of Nation’s Capital
Researchers from Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute gather data for fault history, risks
No one foresaw the 2011 earthquake that shook Washington, D.C., but better maps of the structural geological history of the area will help seismologists understand the potential risks.
Researchers and graduate students from the University of Mississippi‘s Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute recently spent two weeks in the nation’s capital studying the Adams Mill fault to determine if it continues under several important landmarks. The project started over a year ago, but the COVID-19 pandemic and other delays kept the field work from occurring until early August.
The team used ground-penetrating radar; refraction microtremor, a method of mapping underground structures by measuring how underground vibrations are bent and reflected by subsurface layers and faults; and electrical resistivity tomography, a technique of collecting information on soil composition, moisture levels, and fracture zones by measuring changes in electrical resistance, to image the subsurface at the various field sites throughout downtown Washington.
Greg Easson, MMRI director, said that while the data collection trip to the capital will provide valuable research data, it also provided an opportunity to “get the word out” that UM researchers and students conduct important research.
“Collecting geophysical data on several national park sites, including three days at the Washington Monument, was highly visible and attracted attention,” said Easson, also a professor of geology and geological engineering.
“Data showing the locations and last movements of the geological faults in the D.C. area is important for understanding the geological history of the area, and providing input for a better understanding of the seismic risks in the area. The University of Mississippi is contributing in a meaningful manner to answering these important questions.”
Looking Beneath the Surface
The scientists collected geophysical data and a geochronology sample – one that is collected for analysis to determine the age of the material – on the Smithsonian National Zoological Park grounds, where a Potomac River gravel deposit is faulted by the Adams Mill fault. They also collected geophysical data about four miles to the south in the National Mall and monuments area.
“These areas included the grounds of the Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial, Lincoln Memorial, Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial, the JFK Hockey Fields (near the reflecting pool) and Potomac Park,” said Ron Counts, principal investigator and science lead on the project.
Kristian Macias, one of two graduate students who worked on the team, said the trip was “a learning experience.”
“Prior to the trip, I had minimal practice with the ERT, seismic and GPR equipment we were using,” the Biloxi native said. “After the first few days, we practically became experts with the equipment.”
Macias said that he received a lot of comments while using the ground-penetrating radar cart, with many people thinking it was a new, ultra-quiet, electric lawnmower. Like with any project, there were some setbacks.
“One of the most soul-crushing things to happen was losing data after pulling the 60-pound GPR antenna roughly 2,000 meters on the first day,” he said.
Jodi Messick, the other graduate student on the team, said that one of the most memorable things about the trip for her was the number of children who were interested in what they were doing.
“Some would come up to us with their parents, and I had a few come over to talk to me,” the Memphis native said. “I had a child ask me about the kind of jobs geologist do, and what kind of influence geologists had in the United States.”
Still, the team managed to process some of the data early in the collection process – with staggering results.
“The clarity of some of the imaging was so good, it was literally jaw-dropping,” said Counts, MMRI associate director and adjunct professor of geology and geological engineering. “We are only just now starting to process and interpret our data, but preliminary results show that we were able to obtain some great data that appears to image the geological subsurface.”
Lofty Goals and Urban Challenges
The primary goals of the project were to collect data that characterizes what lies beneath the surface and see if the fault’s location could be determined, and to test whether these geophysical methods could successfully reveal what lies underground in an urban environment.
In addition to collecting geophysical data, another project goal was to collect a sample of the gravel that was faulted at the zoo, by the Adams Mill fault, to confirm the preliminary age of approximately 450,000 years that was obtained from a single sample three years ago.
“We spent the better part of two days hand-digging a 6-foot-deep hole on the zoo grounds to get a sample from a gravel that had some cobbles as big as footballs,” Counts said. “The sample will be sent to the U.S. Geological Survey laboratory in Denver, Colorado, for age dating using optically stimulated luminescence dating.”
Working in the nation’s capital brought its share of challenges, but it also brought opportunities and some interesting stories.
“Before we started the field work, I realized we were working within one of the country’s busiest cities and in an area with extensive underground infrastructure,” Counts said. “It was a real possibility that the city’s communications infrastructure would interfere with our equipment and not produce useable data. I did not expect it to work so well.”
Another thing Counts said he didn’t expect was having such a hard time with parking while loading and unloading two vans full of geophysical equipment.
“I lived there for a year in 2016, but traffic seemed much worse than I remembered, even with the pandemic,” he said. “We had to shuffle vehicles every few hours and used the electric scooters and Uber and Lyft ride-share apps to get us around.”
While the data collection crew was on the grounds of the Washington Monument, the president’s helicopter, Marine One, flew over.
“This meant that there was an increased presence of Secret Service agents in the area checking us out,” Counts said.
Additionally, with the work being done in such high-profile areas of D.C., the project attracted its fair share of interest and curiosity from tourists and bystanders.
“Something that was sort of unexpected was the amount of Ole Miss alumni we ran into while in D.C.,” Macias said. “I had a Secret Service officer approach me and I thought I was doing something wrong, but it turns out he was an alumnus and just wanted to say hello.”
A U.S Park Police Officer that approached the group said, “I’m not coming to talk to you as a police officer; I’m coming to talk to you as an Ole Miss Rebel.”
Beside those interactions, a few other officers, and even some tourists, said “Hotty Toddy” to the team while they were working.
Turning Data into Understanding
The team also used the ground-penetrating radar to collect data in Constitution Gardens as a favor to the National Park Service. Park Service planners need the data to understand the subsurface in and around the garden as they plan renovation work on a pond.
With field work completed, the group is processing and interpreting the data with hopes of better understanding the long-term geologic history and seismic risks for the area.
“Conclusions thus far are that some of the techniques we used can work very well in a highly urbanized environment, and electrical resistivity imaging does particularly well at imaging faults on the Atlantic Coastal Plain,” Counts said.
“We expect that the analysis of all of the data will take approximately four to six months. Then we will need to synthesize the data and prepare manuscripts for publication.”
The project is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey under Award No. G20AP00098. This data collection effort has been permitted by the National Park Service, Permit No. NAMA-2021-SCI-0002. All the data collection was noninvasive and nondestructive and presented no danger to the monuments or the public.
By Edwin B. Smith